The lease vs. buy decision is one of the most consequential financial choices a business will make. Get it wrong and you lock up capital that could fuel growth, or you bleed cash on rent with nothing to show for it a decade later. Get it right and you gain either strategic flexibility or long-term wealth creation, depending on your circumstances.

Yet most businesses make this decision based on gut feeling or a single spreadsheet comparison of monthly payments. That approach misses the full picture: opportunity cost, tax shields, equity accumulation, residual value risk, and the time value of money. In this guide, we walk through the complete financial analysis, including NPV, IRR, break-even, and sensitivity analysis, with real numbers you can adapt to your own situation.

72% Of businesses lease their commercial space
6.5% Avg. cap rate for CRE in 2026
$2.1M Median CRE purchase price
8–12% Typical required IRR for CRE

The Decision Framework: When Leasing Wins vs. When Buying Wins

Before diving into the math, it helps to understand the strategic factors that tilt the analysis in one direction. Financial models are only as useful as the assumptions behind them, and those assumptions depend heavily on your business context.

When Leasing Makes Strategic Sense

When Buying Makes Strategic Sense

Key principle: The lease vs. buy decision is fundamentally about capital allocation. You are comparing the risk-adjusted return of putting capital into real estate versus deploying it in your core business or other investments.

Scenario Setup: The Numbers We Will Use

To make this analysis concrete, we will use a 5,000 sq ft commercial office property with the following baseline assumptions throughout every calculation in this guide:

Total Cost of Leasing: 10-Year Projection

In a triple-net (NNN) lease, the tenant pays base rent plus property taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance. With a 3% annual escalation on base rent and NNN expenses growing at approximately 2.5% annually, the total occupancy cost compounds significantly over a decade.

Year Base Rent NNN Costs Total Cost Cumulative
1$180,000$60,000$240,000$240,000
2$185,400$61,500$246,900$486,900
3$190,962$63,038$254,000$740,900
4$196,691$64,614$261,305$1,002,205
5$202,592$66,229$268,821$1,271,026
6$208,670$67,885$276,555$1,547,581
7$214,930$69,582$284,512$1,832,093
8$221,378$71,322$292,700$2,124,793
9$228,019$73,105$301,124$2,425,917
10$234,860$74,933$309,793$2,735,710

Watch the compounding: Year 10 rent is 30.5% higher than Year 1 rent due to the 3% escalation. Over 10 years, you pay $2,735,710 in total occupancy costs with zero equity to show for it. This is the core argument for buying, but it ignores the time value of money and opportunity cost.

Total Cost of Buying: 10-Year Projection

Ownership costs include the mortgage payment, property taxes, insurance, maintenance reserves, and the initial down payment. However, ownership also generates equity through principal paydown and property appreciation.

Monthly Mortgage Payment Calculation
Loan Amount (P) = $1,575,000
Monthly Rate (r) = 6.5% / 12 = 0.5417%
Number of Payments (n) = 25 × 12 = 300

M = P × [r(1+r)^n] / [(1+r)^n - 1]
M = $1,575,000 × [0.005417 × (1.005417)^300] / [(1.005417)^300 - 1]
M = $1,575,000 × [0.005417 × 5.0414] / [5.0414 - 1]
M = $1,575,000 × 0.02731 / 4.0414
M = $1,575,000 × 0.006757
Monthly Payment = $10,642 → Annual = $127,704
Year Mortgage Taxes + Ins. Maint. Total Out Principal Paid
1$127,704$42,000$21,000$190,704$26,354
2$127,704$43,260$21,630$192,594$28,112
3$127,704$44,558$22,279$194,541$29,987
4$127,704$45,895$22,947$196,546$31,987
5$127,704$47,272$23,636$198,612$34,121
6$127,704$48,690$24,345$200,739$36,400
7$127,704$50,151$25,076$202,931$38,833
8$127,704$51,655$25,828$205,187$41,430
9$127,704$53,205$26,603$207,512$44,203
10$127,704$54,801$27,401$209,906$47,163

10-year total cash out for ownership: $1,999,272 (excluding the $525,000 down payment). Including the down payment, total cash deployed is $2,524,272. However, after 10 years you have built approximately $358,590 in equity through principal paydown, plus the property has appreciated to an estimated $2,822,370 (at 3% annual appreciation).

NPV Comparison: The Time-Value-of-Money Analysis

Comparing raw dollar totals is misleading because it ignores when each cash flow occurs. A dollar paid in Year 10 costs you less in today's terms than a dollar paid today. Net Present Value (NPV) discounts all future cash flows back to the present using your company's cost of capital.

NPV of Leasing

NPV(Lease) = ∑ [Annual Lease Cost / (1 + r)^t] for t = 1 to 10
Discount Rate (r) = 9%

Year 1: $240,000 / (1.09)^1 = $220,183
Year 2: $246,900 / (1.09)^2 = $207,847
Year 3: $254,000 / (1.09)^3 = $196,145
Year 4: $261,305 / (1.09)^4 = $185,127
Year 5: $268,821 / (1.09)^5 = $174,742
Year 6: $276,555 / (1.09)^6 = $164,946
Year 7: $284,512 / (1.09)^7 = $155,700
Year 8: $292,700 / (1.09)^8 = $146,966
Year 9: $301,124 / (1.09)^9 = $138,711
Year 10: $309,793 / (1.09)^10 = $130,901
NPV of Leasing = $1,721,268

NPV of Buying

The buying NPV is more complex because we must account for the upfront down payment, annual operating costs, tax benefits, and the terminal value (property sale proceeds minus remaining mortgage) at Year 10.

NPV(Buy) = Down Payment + ∑ [Annual Net Cost / (1 + r)^t] - Terminal Value / (1 + r)^10
Down Payment (Year 0) = $525,000

Annual Net Cost = Mortgage + Taxes + Insurance + Maintenance - Tax Deductions
Tax Deductions = (Interest + Depreciation + Taxes) × 25%

Year 1 Interest = $101,350 | Depreciation = $53,846 (39-year straight-line)
Year 1 Tax Deduction = ($101,350 + $53,846 + $42,000) × 0.25 = $49,299
Year 1 Net Cost = $190,704 - $49,299 = $141,405

Terminal Value at Year 10:
Property Value = $2,100,000 × (1.03)^10 = $2,822,370
Remaining Mortgage = $1,575,000 - $358,590 principal paid = $1,216,410
Sale Costs (6%) = $169,342
Net Sale Proceeds = $2,822,370 - $1,216,410 - $169,342 = $1,436,618
PV of Terminal Value = $1,436,618 / (1.09)^10 = $606,680
NPV of Buying = $525,000 + $963,318 (PV of 10-yr net costs) - $606,680 = $881,638

Side-by-Side NPV Comparison

$1,721,268 NPV of Leasing (total cost in today's dollars)
$881,638 NPV of Buying (total cost in today's dollars)

Under baseline assumptions, buying saves $839,630 in present-value terms over 10 years. However, this result is highly sensitive to the appreciation rate, discount rate, and holding period. We stress-test these assumptions in the sensitivity analysis below.

IRR Calculation: What Return Does Buying Actually Deliver?

The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) tells you the annualized return on the capital you invest in purchasing the property. It is the discount rate that makes the NPV of all cash flows equal to zero. For an owner-occupant, cash flows include the down payment, annual net cost savings vs. leasing, and the terminal equity value.

0 = -Initial Investment + ∑ [Net Annual Benefit / (1 + IRR)^t] + Terminal Value / (1 + IRR)^10
Initial Investment (Year 0) = -$525,000

Net Annual Benefit = Lease Cost Avoided - Ownership Net Cost
Year 1: $240,000 - $141,405 = $98,595
Year 2: $246,900 - $143,857 = $103,043
Year 3: $254,000 - $146,389 = $107,611
Year 4: $261,305 - $148,975 = $112,330
Year 5: $268,821 - $151,594 = $117,227
Year 6: $276,555 - $154,238 = $122,317
Year 7: $284,512 - $156,904 = $127,608
Year 8: $292,700 - $159,592 = $133,108
Year 9: $301,124 - $162,302 = $138,822
Year 10: $309,793 - $165,034 = $144,759

Terminal Equity Value at Year 10 = $1,436,618

Solving iteratively for IRR where NPV = 0:
IRR = 34.7% (well above the 8-12% typical hurdle rate)

An IRR of 34.7% looks extremely attractive, but remember: this is partly because the "cash flows" include avoided rent. If you already have a free or very cheap space, the IRR on buying drops substantially. The IRR also changes dramatically with different appreciation assumptions.

Sensitivity Analysis: IRR at Different Appreciation Rates

Annual Appreciation Property Value (Yr 10) Net Sale Proceeds IRR Verdict
0%$2,100,000$713,49024.8%Above Hurdle
2%$2,559,748$1,189,65931.2%Above Hurdle
3% (base)$2,822,370$1,436,61834.7%Above Hurdle
4%$3,108,395$1,722,92338.1%Above Hurdle
6%$3,761,464$2,319,37644.5%Above Hurdle

Even at 0% appreciation, the IRR remains well above typical hurdle rates because the rent savings alone create substantial annual cash flow benefits. The buy decision is robust across appreciation scenarios in this example, though results will differ for properties where lease rates are low relative to purchase price.

Tax Implications: Lease vs. Buy

The tax treatment differs significantly between leasing and buying. Understanding these differences can shift the NPV comparison by tens of thousands of dollars.

Tax Deduction Leasing Buying
Rent Payments 100% deductible as operating expense N/A
Mortgage Interest N/A 100% deductible (~$101K in Year 1, declining)
Depreciation N/A Building depreciated over 39 years: ~$53,846/yr
Property Taxes Passed through in NNN; deductible as rent Directly deductible (~$26,250/yr)
Insurance Passed through in NNN; deductible as rent Directly deductible (~$15,750/yr)
Maintenance Landlord's responsibility (for non-NNN items) Deductible as business expense
Capital Gains at Sale N/A Taxable at sale; depreciation recapture at 25%
Annual Tax Benefit Comparison (Year 1)
LEASING Tax Deduction:
Rent + NNN = $240,000 × 25% tax rate = $60,000 tax savings

BUYING Tax Deductions:
Mortgage Interest: $101,350 × 25% = $25,338
Depreciation: $53,846 × 25% = $13,462
Property Taxes: $26,250 × 25% = $6,563
Insurance: $15,750 × 25% = $3,938
Maintenance: $21,000 × 25% = $5,250
Leasing Tax Savings: $60,000 | Buying Tax Savings: $54,551 | Difference: $5,449 favoring lease

Leasing provides a slightly higher Year 1 tax deduction because 100% of lease payments are immediately deductible, while buying locks some tax benefit into depreciation schedules. However, ownership generates long-term equity that offsets this short-term tax advantage. Also note that depreciation recapture at sale can create a significant tax liability that reduces your net terminal value.

Opportunity Cost Analysis: What Else Could the Down Payment Earn?

The $525,000 down payment is capital that could be deployed elsewhere. If your business earns strong returns, that money may generate more value than real estate equity. This is the most frequently overlooked factor in the lease vs. buy analysis.

Future Value of Down Payment at Alternative Return Rates
FV = PV × (1 + r)^n where PV = $525,000, n = 10 years

At 7% (index fund): $525,000 × (1.07)^10 = $1,032,735
At 10% (strong business reinvestment): $525,000 × (1.10)^10 = $1,361,794
At 15% (high-growth business): $525,000 × (1.15)^10 = $2,123,919
At 20% (exceptional business): $525,000 × (1.20)^10 = $3,250,538
At 15%+ business returns, the opportunity cost exceeds real estate equity gains

If your business consistently generates returns above 12-15%, leasing almost certainly makes more financial sense regardless of real estate appreciation. The down payment is better deployed in your core business. Conversely, if your best alternative investment yields 6-7%, real estate looks attractive by comparison.

Break-Even Analysis: When Does Buying Become Cheaper?

The break-even point is the year at which cumulative ownership costs (including opportunity cost of the down payment) cross below cumulative leasing costs, accounting for equity build-up in the property.

Break-Even: Year where Cumulative Lease Cost > Cumulative Buy Cost (net of equity)
Cumulative Net Buy Cost = Down Payment + All Annual Costs - Equity Built - Appreciation Gain
(Using 9% opportunity cost on down payment, 3% appreciation)

Year 3: Lease Cumulative = $740,900 | Buy Net = $929,814 → Lease cheaper by $188,914
Year 5: Lease Cumulative = $1,271,026 | Buy Net = $1,134,667 → Lease cheaper by $136,359
Year 7: Lease Cumulative = $1,832,093 | Buy Net = $1,498,231 → Buy cheaper by $333,862
Year 8: Lease Cumulative = $2,124,793 | Buy Net = $1,605,429 → Buy cheaper by $519,364
Year 10: Lease Cumulative = $2,735,710 | Buy Net = $1,563,654 → Buy cheaper by $1,172,056
Break-Even Point: Approximately Year 5.8 (buying becomes cheaper after ~6 years)

Critical caveat: This break-even assumes you actually sell the property at Year 10 and realize the equity. If you hold indefinitely without a liquidity event, the "equity" is paper wealth. Also, a market downturn near your planned exit can push the break-even point out significantly. Stress-test with a 0% appreciation scenario, where break-even extends to approximately Year 8.2.

Lease vs. Buy Across 8 Key Dimensions

Dimension Leasing Buying
Flexibility High; can relocate at lease end Advantage Low; illiquid asset, 3-12 months to sell
Upfront Cost First/last month + security deposit (~$60K) Advantage Down payment + closing costs (~$567K)
Monthly Cost $20,000/mo and rising 3%/yr $15,892/mo fixed mortgage + variable expenses Advantage
Tax Treatment 100% deductible rent; simple Comparable Interest + depreciation + expenses; complex Comparable
Equity Building None; all payments are pure expense Builds equity through paydown + appreciation Advantage
Maintenance Landlord responsible (structural/roof/HVAC) Advantage 100% owner responsibility; budget 1-2% of value/yr
Balance Sheet (ASC 842) Right-of-use asset + lease liability on balance sheet Property asset + mortgage liability on balance sheet Comparable
Exit Cost Remaining lease obligation; possible sublease Advantage 5-7% transaction costs to sell; potential capital gains tax

Industry-Specific Considerations

The lease vs. buy calculus varies dramatically by industry because each sector has different space requirements, build-out costs, and operational stability profiles.

Medical & Dental Practices

Recommendation: Buy when possible. Medical build-outs routinely cost $150-$300/sq ft, and specialized plumbing, electrical, and radiation shielding cannot be moved. Owning eliminates the risk of losing this massive investment at lease end. Additionally, medical practices typically have stable, long-term patient bases tied to specific locations, making the 10+ year holding period natural.

Restaurants & Food Service

Recommendation: Lease in most cases. The restaurant industry has a 60% failure rate within the first three years. Even successful restaurants may need to relocate based on shifting neighborhood demographics. A lease limits your downside. However, established restaurant groups with proven concepts and 10+ year track records may benefit from ownership, especially if they can lease excess space.

Warehouse & Distribution

Recommendation: Buy for stable operations, lease for growth-phase companies. Warehouse space is relatively commodity-like with lower build-out costs, making leasing easy. But if your distribution needs are stable and you require specialized features (cold storage, dock configurations, ceiling height), buying locks in those specs and avoids the risk of rent spikes in tight industrial markets.

Professional Office

Recommendation: Lease unless you have 10+ year certainty. The office market is undergoing structural change with hybrid work models. Space requirements per employee have dropped 15-25% since 2020. Buying locks you into a fixed footprint when you may need significantly less (or different) space in 5 years. Leasing preserves the option to right-size.

12-Item Checklist: Making the Lease vs. Buy Decision

Red Flags: When the Analysis Is Misleading

Watch for these warning signs that your lease vs. buy analysis may be leading you to the wrong conclusion:

  1. Using a discount rate below your actual cost of capital. This artificially inflates the NPV advantage of buying by undervaluing the time cost of money. A 6% discount rate versus a 10% discount rate can swing the analysis by hundreds of thousands of dollars.
  2. Assuming above-market appreciation rates. Projecting 5-6% annual appreciation based on the last few years of a hot market ignores mean reversion. Use long-term averages (2-3%) and stress-test with 0%.
  3. Ignoring transaction costs on sale. Broker commissions, transfer taxes, closing costs, and depreciation recapture can consume 8-12% of the sale price. This dramatically reduces your terminal value.
  4. Forgetting the capital expenditure reserve. Roofs, HVAC systems, parking lots, and elevators require major capital expenditures every 10-15 years. Budget 1-2% of property value annually, or your ownership costs are understated.
  5. Comparing a below-market lease to a fair-value purchase. If your current lease is below market, leasing looks artificially good. Use market-rate rents for a fair comparison.
  6. Not accounting for vacancy risk between tenants. If you plan to lease part of the building, even one month of vacancy per year erases a meaningful portion of rental income. Budget for 5-8% vacancy in mixed-use scenarios.

Frequently Asked Questions

What discount rate should I use for a lease vs. buy NPV analysis?
Most businesses use their weighted average cost of capital (WACC) as the discount rate, typically ranging from 8% to 12% for mid-market companies. If you don't know your WACC, a common proxy is your borrowing rate plus 2-3% to account for equity risk. Using a rate that's too low will bias the analysis toward buying, while a rate that's too high will favor leasing.
How long do I need to own a commercial property before buying becomes cheaper than leasing?
The break-even point for buying vs. leasing commercial property typically falls between 7 and 12 years, depending on local market conditions, interest rates, and appreciation rates. In high-appreciation markets, break-even can occur as early as 5-6 years. In flat or declining markets, it may never break even. Our analysis shows 8.2 years as the break-even point under moderate assumptions.
Does ASC 842 change the lease vs. buy decision for businesses?
Yes. Under ASC 842, operating leases now appear as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. This reduces the traditional off-balance-sheet advantage of leasing. However, leasing still offers different financial statement treatment than ownership, and the income statement impact differs between the two approaches. The change makes the decision more nuanced but doesn't eliminate the case for leasing.
What IRR should I target when buying commercial property for my business?
Most businesses target an IRR of 8-12% on owner-occupied commercial property to justify the capital commitment. This should exceed your WACC by at least 2-3 percentage points to compensate for the illiquidity and concentration risk of real estate. If the property IRR falls below your company's hurdle rate, leasing is likely the better financial decision.
Should I factor in property appreciation when comparing lease vs. buy costs?
Absolutely, but be conservative. Commercial property has historically appreciated at 2-4% annually on a national basis, but individual properties vary enormously based on location, condition, and market cycles. Use multiple scenarios (0%, 2%, and 4% appreciation) to stress-test your analysis. Never base the buy decision solely on optimistic appreciation assumptions.
What hidden costs do most businesses miss in a lease vs. buy analysis?
The most commonly missed costs include: opportunity cost of the down payment (what that capital could earn elsewhere), transaction costs when selling (typically 5-7% of sale price), capital expenditure reserves for buying (1-2% of property value annually), and lease escalation compounding for leasing. Businesses also frequently underestimate property management time costs for ownership and CAM charge increases for leasing.

Final Thoughts: Numbers First, Then Strategy

The lease vs. buy decision should start with rigorous financial modeling but cannot end there. The NPV and IRR calculations in this guide clearly favor buying under our baseline assumptions: a 10-year hold, 3% appreciation, and 9% discount rate produce an NPV advantage of over $839,000 for purchasing. The IRR of 34.7% far exceeds typical hurdle rates even under pessimistic appreciation scenarios.

However, the right decision for your business depends on factors that don't fit neatly into a spreadsheet. How confident are you in your 10-year space forecast? Can you afford to have $525,000+ tied up in an illiquid asset? Does your industry face disruption that could change your space needs? Do you have the bandwidth to manage property ownership on top of running your business?

The most common mistake we see is businesses making this decision based on monthly payment comparisons alone. A proper analysis requires NPV, IRR, sensitivity testing, opportunity cost evaluation, and break-even calculation. The math is not complicated, but it requires discipline to model honestly, using conservative assumptions and stress-testing the results.

Whichever path you choose, make sure your lease terms are optimized. Even if you decide to buy, you may lease for several years first. And if you decide leasing is the right long-term strategy, the terms of that lease will determine hundreds of thousands of dollars in costs over its life. Understanding exactly what you are signing is not optional; it is the foundation of sound real estate strategy.

Analyze Your Lease Terms Before Making the Lease vs. Buy Decision

Whether you are evaluating a new lease or reviewing your current one, LeaseAI extracts and analyzes every clause, escalation, and financial term in minutes. Make the lease vs. buy decision with complete information.

Analyze Your Lease →