Commercial Lease SNDA: Subordination, Non-Disturbance & Attornment Explained

Q: Why is subordination alone dangerous for tenants?

Subordination alone — without non-disturbance — creates an existential risk for the tenant. When a tenant's lease is subordinated to a mortgage, the lease becomes junior to the mortgage in the priority chain. If the landlord defaults on the mortgage and the lender forecloses, the foreclosure extinguishes all junior interests — including the subordinated lease. The tenant can be evicted even though they are paying rent and are in full compliance with their lease, simply because the landlord failed to make mortgage payments. Without a non-disturbance agreement, subordination alone means the tenant's right to remain in possession is entirely dependent on the landlord's financial health — not the tenant's own compliance.

Q: What is non-disturbance in an SNDA agreement?

Non-disturbance is the lender's contractual commitment to the tenant that if the mortgage goes into foreclosure, the lender (or a new owner taking title through foreclosure) will not terminate the tenant's lease, will not disturb the tenant's possession, and will recognize the tenant's lease as binding — provided the tenant is not in default at the time of foreclosure and remains in compliance with the lease terms going forward. Non-disturbance effectively decouples the tenant's possessory rights from the landlord's financial health. A tenant with non-disturbance protection can continue to occupy the premises through a foreclosure, paying rent to the new owner under the existing lease terms.

Q: What does 'quiet enjoyment' mean in commercial leases?

Quiet enjoyment in a commercial lease is the landlord's covenant to the tenant that the tenant will be able to occupy and use the premises without interference from the landlord, the landlord's lenders, or any party claiming through the landlord — for the full lease term, as long as the tenant complies with the lease. The covenant of quiet enjoyment is broader than SNDA: it applies not just to mortgage foreclosure scenarios, but to any interference with the tenant's possession (including the landlord's own physical interference, claims by prior owners, or competing claimants to the property). In practice, SNDA non-disturbance provisions are the contractual mechanism by which lenders give tenants quiet enjoyment protection vis-à-vis the mortgage.

Q: How should tenants negotiate SNDA agreements with lenders?

Tenants should negotiate several key SNDA protections: (1) confirm non-disturbance applies even if the tenant signed before the mortgage was recorded ('pre-existing lease' non-disturbance); (2) require that TI allowances unpaid at foreclosure must be funded by the new owner; (3) confirm that the new owner takes the lease subject to all tenant options (renewal, expansion, ROFR, termination); (4) require that the lender respond to the SNDA execution request within a defined timeline (typically 30 days); (5) include deposit protections — if the new owner takes the security deposit from the landlord, they must credit the tenant at lease end. Most importantly, insist on direct lender execution of the SNDA — not just landlord's representation that the lender has agreed.

The Three Components of SNDA

Subordination: What You're Agreeing To

Subordination is the tenant's agreement that their lease is junior in priority to the landlord's mortgage. Priority matters in real estate because of how liens and interests are extinguished in a foreclosure: when a lender forecloses on a senior mortgage, all interests that are junior to that mortgage are extinguished (wiped out). Senior interests survive.

By signing a subordination agreement, the tenant moves their lease below the mortgage in the priority chain. This is what the lender wants: a subordinated lease can be extinguished in foreclosure, giving the lender a clean title to the property without existing tenant leases complicating the disposition.

Most commercial leases include a self-executing subordination clause: the lease is automatically subordinated to any current or future mortgage without the tenant needing to sign a separate document. But many lenders require a separate, recorded SNDA agreement because they want a document they can point to in foreclosure proceedings.

Non-Disturbance: The Critical Protection

Non-disturbance is the lender's promise to the tenant that: even though your lease is subordinated to my mortgage, if I foreclose on the landlord's mortgage, I will not use the foreclosure to terminate your lease. I will recognize your lease, honor your right to possession, and allow you to continue occupying the premises under your existing lease terms — as long as you are not in default.

Non-disturbance effectively decouples the tenant's occupancy rights from the landlord's financial health. A tenant with non-disturbance can sleep at night knowing that even if their landlord files for bankruptcy, stops making mortgage payments, or loses the property in a foreclosure, the tenant's lease continues — because the lender has committed to honoring it.

Without non-disturbance, subordination alone is a one-sided deal: the tenant subordinates their lease, facilitating the lender's foreclosure, but receives nothing in return. The lender retains the option to extinguish the lease in foreclosure if it suits them — which it often does, since a vacant, unencumbered building is generally easier to sell than one with tenants in place.

Attornment: The Tenant's Half of the Bargain

Attornment is the tenant's agreement to recognize a new owner — whoever acquires the property through foreclosure, deed in lieu, or sale — as the new landlord under the existing lease. Attornment completes the circle: the tenant subordinated to facilitate the foreclosure, the lender provided non-disturbance to protect the tenant through the foreclosure, and the tenant now agrees to attorn to (acknowledge and pay rent to) the new owner.

Automatic vs. elective attornment:

Automatic attornment: The tenant automatically recognizes any new owner as the new landlord at the moment of ownership transfer, without any additional agreement. This is the best structure for tenants because there is no gap in lease protection, no need for a new lease negotiation, and no leverage for the new owner to demand modified terms as a condition of recognition.
Elective/optional attornment: The new owner has the option to require the tenant to execute a new lease or modified lease terms as a condition of accepting the tenant's continued occupancy. This structure gives the new owner leverage to re-negotiate terms at foreclosure — potentially increasing rent, removing favorable options, or eliminating rights that existed in the original lease. Tenants should strongly resist elective attornment provisions.

Why Subordination Without Non-Disturbance Is Dangerous

The Foreclosure Scenario

Consider a typical scenario: a tenant signs a 10-year commercial lease and agrees to subordinate their lease to the landlord's existing and future mortgage. No non-disturbance agreement is obtained from the lender. Three years into the lease, the landlord's real estate portfolio gets into financial trouble. The landlord stops making mortgage payments. Two months later, the lender initiates foreclosure proceedings.

Because the tenant's lease is subordinated to the mortgage, the foreclosure proceedings — when completed — extinguish the tenant's lease. The tenant receives a notice from the foreclosure court (or the new owner after foreclosure concludes) demanding vacation of the premises. The tenant has no legal right to remain — their lease was terminated by operation of law when the foreclosure extinguished all junior interests. They must vacate, find a new location, and absorb the full disruption of an involuntary relocation.

The tenant was in perfect compliance with their lease. They were paying rent on time every month. They did everything right. They still lost their space — because the landlord's financial failure became the tenant's problem, made possible by a subordination they agreed to without non-disturbance protection.

The Dollar Exposure

Tenant Exposure: Losing a Lease Without Non-Disturbance

Scenario: 10-year lease, tenant 3 years in at foreclosure
Remaining term: 7 years
Leased space: 3,000 sf
Current rent: $40/sf/year = $120,000/year ($10,000/month)
Below-market advantage (market is now $52/sf): $12/sf/year

DIRECT RELOCATION COSTS:
New space at market rent ($52/sf × 3,000sf): $156,000/year
vs. current rent: $120,000/year
Annual rent premium at new location: $36,000/year
7-year rent premium (remaining term value): $252,000

Moving and relocation costs: $25,000 – $80,000
TI at new location (not funded by landlord): $90,000 – $180,000
New signage, stationery, address changes: $5,000 – $15,000
Business interruption (1–3 months): $50,000 – $150,000
Legal fees: $15,000 – $45,000

TOTAL 7-YEAR ECONOMIC EXPOSURE: $437,000 – $722,000
(Present value of rent premium + direct costs)

Add value of lost options (2 × 5-yr renewals at
below-market rate — $12/sf advantage × 3,000sf × 10yr): $360,000+

TOTAL EXPOSURE WITH OPTIONS: $840,000+

Non-disturbance agreement cost to negotiate: $0 additional

Quiet Enjoyment: The Broader Protection

The Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment

The covenant of quiet enjoyment is a landlord's promise, implied or express in every commercial lease, that the tenant will be able to peacefully occupy and use the leased premises for the full lease term without interference from the landlord, anyone claiming through the landlord, or anyone with a superior interest in the property — as long as the tenant complies with the lease.

Quiet enjoyment is broader than non-disturbance in an important sense: it applies to all potential interferences with possession, not just mortgage foreclosure scenarios. The covenant of quiet enjoyment is breached by:

Physical interference by the landlord (changing locks, removing services, constructing walls, physically blocking access)
Third-party claims to superior title that dispossess the tenant
Government condemnation or eminent domain proceedings
Mortgage foreclosure by a senior lienholder (when no non-disturbance agreement exists)
Prior title defects that surface and affect the tenant's possessory rights

Quiet Enjoyment vs. Non-Disturbance: Which Applies

In a foreclosure scenario, both the covenant of quiet enjoyment and the non-disturbance agreement are potentially at issue — but they operate differently:

The covenant of quiet enjoyment runs from landlord to tenant. If the landlord's foreclosure terminates the tenant's lease, the landlord has breached the covenant — but the landlord may have no assets to satisfy a damages claim (they've just lost the property to their lender).
Non-disturbance runs from the lender to the tenant. The lender — who has the assets and resources — is directly bound. The tenant can enforce non-disturbance against the lender in a foreclosure proceeding.

This is why non-disturbance from the lender — not just the landlord's covenant of quiet enjoyment — is the critical protection. The landlord's quiet enjoyment promise is only as good as the landlord's financial health; the lender's non-disturbance agreement is as good as the lender's institutional commitment.

The Priority Problem: When Was Your Lease Recorded?

Pre-Existing Leases vs. Leases Post-Dating the Mortgage

The need for non-disturbance differs depending on whether the lease pre-dates or post-dates the mortgage:

Lease recorded before the mortgage: The lease is senior to the mortgage in the priority chain — the lender took their mortgage with notice of the existing lease, and the lease survives foreclosure automatically. Non-disturbance is less critical (though still desirable for clarity). The lender cannot extinguish a senior lease through foreclosure.
Lease recorded after the mortgage: This is the most common scenario — the building has an existing mortgage when the tenant signs. The lease is junior to the mortgage by default. Subordination merely confirms what priority already dictates. Non-disturbance is essential, because without it, the senior mortgage foreclosure will extinguish the junior lease.

Scenario	Lease Priority vs. Mortgage	Foreclosure Effect on Lease	Non-Disturbance Needed?
Lease signed before mortgage recorded	Lease is senior	Lease survives foreclosure	Less critical (but still good practice)
Lease signed after mortgage recorded (no subordination)	Lease is junior by law	Lease extinguished at foreclosure	Critical
Lease signed after mortgage, with subordination clause	Lease is junior (confirmed)	Lease extinguished at foreclosure	Critical
Lease with subordination + non-disturbance	Lease is junior (confirmed)	Lease survives foreclosure (protected)	Already provided ✓
Lease with subordination only (no ND)	Lease is junior (confirmed)	Lease extinguished at lender's election	YES — urgent negotiation needed

Negotiating SNDA: Through the Landlord vs. Directly with the Lender

The Two Paths to an SNDA

Tenants can obtain an SNDA through two routes:

Through the landlord: The landlord represents in the lease that they will obtain an SNDA from their lender within a specified period (typically 30–90 days after lease execution). The landlord coordinates with the lender and delivers an executed SNDA to the tenant.
Directly with the lender: The tenant negotiates the SNDA directly with the landlord's lender, without relying on the landlord as an intermediary. This is more work but provides more protection — the tenant can review and negotiate the SNDA terms directly with the party who is making the commitment.

The landlord-intermediary path is more common in practice, but carries a risk: the landlord may not obtain the SNDA despite their promise, and the lease may not include a meaningful remedy for that failure (often only a right to terminate, not damages or a right to withhold rent). Direct lender negotiation eliminates this intermediary risk.

The Lender SNDA Form: Standard Pitfalls

Most major commercial lenders have their own standard SNDA form — a Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, bank, insurance company, or CMBS lender template. These forms are drafted to protect the lender and typically contain provisions that, if left unmodified, disadvantage the tenant:

Lender SNDA Forms Are Not Tenant-Friendly: Lender SNDA forms are designed to minimize the lender's post-foreclosure obligations and maximize flexibility for the new owner. A tenant who signs a lender's standard SNDA without modifications may receive non-disturbance that protects their right to possession but loses most of the economic benefits of their lease (unpaid TI allowance, renewal options, expansion rights, ROFR). Always review lender SNDA forms against the lease terms and negotiate modifications before signing.

Common Lender SNDA Form Pitfalls

Unpaid TI allowance abandoned: Many lender SNDA forms state that the new owner (successor landlord after foreclosure) is not bound by any landlord obligations that arise or accrue before the foreclosure — including unpaid tenant improvement allowances. If the landlord owed you $200,000 in TI allowance at the time of foreclosure, the new lender owner may not be obligated to fund it. Negotiate to require the new owner to fund any unpaid TI allowance that was the original landlord's obligation.
Options not recognized: Lender SNDA forms often exclude "options" from the non-disturbance protection — meaning renewal options, expansion options, and right of first refusal are not recognized by the new owner. If the non-disturbance protects only the tenant's possessory right at the current rent but doesn't preserve options, the new owner can refuse to honor renewal options and force the tenant to vacate at expiration — or re-negotiate at current market rates. Insist that all options and special rights in the lease are specifically preserved in the SNDA.
Non-disturbance conditioned on "no defaults": Non-disturbance typically protects only tenants who are not in default at the time of foreclosure. Many lender forms define "default" broadly — including technical defaults that might not rise to the level of a material breach (e.g., a late rent payment cured within the cure period, a notice that was sent to the wrong address, an estoppel not returned in time). Negotiate a narrow default definition tied only to uncured material monetary defaults and material non-monetary defaults beyond their cure period.
Security deposit transferred but not protected: After a foreclosure, the new owner may receive the security deposit that was held by the original landlord as part of the property assets. If the SNDA doesn't specifically require the new owner to credit the tenant's security deposit at lease end, the tenant could lose their deposit — having paid it to the original landlord who retained it (it became part of the foreclosure assets), with no obligation on the new owner to return it. Require the SNDA to specifically address security deposit transfer and the new owner's obligation to return it.
Free rent periods not honored: If the tenant has remaining free rent periods (e.g., months 13–15 of a lease were designated as free rent months), a lender SNDA that excludes "pre-foreclosure landlord obligations" may allow the new owner to claim the tenant owes full rent for those periods. Negotiate to include all economic lease terms — free rent, rent abatement, and concessions — within the scope of the non-disturbance protection.

SNDA Timing: When to Ask and What to Expect

Timing SNDA Requests in the Lease Negotiation

The ideal time to obtain an SNDA is before the lease is executed — or as a condition of the lease becoming effective. A lease condition precedent requiring SNDA execution gives the tenant maximum leverage: if the landlord's lender won't provide non-disturbance on acceptable terms, the tenant doesn't need to sign the lease. Once the lease is signed without an SNDA, the tenant has far less leverage in SNDA negotiations because they are already bound to the space.

If making SNDA a condition precedent is not possible (landlord resistance, timeline pressure), the next best approach is a lease provision requiring the landlord to deliver a fully executed SNDA within 30–60 days of lease execution, with a tenant right to terminate if the SNDA is not delivered on time. This provides a meaningful remedy for landlord failure to obtain the SNDA.

SNDA Response Timeline

Lender SNDA review and execution typically takes 3–8 weeks depending on:

Lender type (bank, insurance company, CMBS servicer)
Whether the lender uses their own form or is negotiating modifications to a tenant's proposed form
CMBS loan servicers are often the slowest — they must get approval from the special servicer or trust administrator and may take 6–12 weeks even for routine SNDA requests

6 Red Flags in SNDA Provisions

🛑 Red Flag 1: Lease Contains Subordination but No Non-Disturbance

The most dangerous SNDA situation: the tenant has agreed to subordinate their lease to all existing and future mortgages, but no lender has provided non-disturbance. The lease may include a landlord promise to "use commercially reasonable efforts" to obtain an SNDA — but if the landlord fails, the tenant's only remedy may be lease termination (with no damages for the disruption cost). For any lease in a building with existing financing, confirm that a fully executed SNDA from the existing lender is either already in place or will be delivered as a condition of lease effectiveness.

🛑 Red Flag 2: SNDA Does Not Preserve Tenant's Options and Special Rights

An SNDA that protects the right to possess at current rent but doesn't preserve renewal options, expansion rights, ROFR, termination rights, or special use rights gives the new owner the ability to re-negotiate or extinguish all the tenant's economic optionality at foreclosure. A retail tenant who gave up above-market square footage at a below-market rate in exchange for a renewal option, only to have that option disappear in foreclosure, has received far less protection than they bargained for. Always require explicit SNDA language preserving all options and special rights identified in the lease.

🛑 Red Flag 3: Lender SNDA Excludes Unpaid TI Allowance Obligations

A lender SNDA that releases the new owner from any landlord obligations "arising prior to or in connection with the foreclosure" typically eliminates the tenant's right to receive unpaid TI allowance from the new owner. If a landlord has committed to fund $500,000 in TI allowance and defaults on the mortgage before funding that allowance, the tenant has no TI — and may have already completed construction relying on the expected TI. Negotiate explicit SNDA language requiring the new owner to fund any TI allowance committed but not yet paid under the original lease.

🛑 Red Flag 4: Non-Disturbance Is Conditional on Tenant Not Being in "Any Default"

If non-disturbance protection is conditioned on the tenant not being "in default under the lease" — with "default" broadly defined — then a technical default that the tenant hasn't even been notified of could eliminate non-disturbance protection at the exact moment the tenant needs it most (during a foreclosure). Negotiate that non-disturbance is conditioned only on the tenant not being in an "uncured material default after notice and expiration of applicable cure periods" — the same standard that would allow lease termination in the normal course.

🛑 Red Flag 5: Automatic Self-Executing Subordination Without Bound Lender

A lease that includes a self-executing subordination clause (the lease is automatically subordinated to any current and future mortgage) without requiring the landlord to obtain a corresponding non-disturbance from future lenders is a trap. The subordination is automatic and binding; the non-disturbance may never materialize if the landlord refinances or adds new debt without coordinating with the tenant. Require the lease to include an obligation that the landlord obtain non-disturbance from any future lender within 30 days of placing new mortgage debt on the property, failing which the tenant's obligation to subordinate to that new loan is suspended.

🛑 Red Flag 6: Elective Attornment Allows New Owner to Re-Negotiate Lease Terms

An elective or optional attornment provision — where the new owner (post-foreclosure) has the right to "require" the tenant to attorn and to set the terms of that attornment — gives the new owner leverage to re-negotiate lease terms as a condition of recognizing the tenant's continued occupancy. The new owner can effectively demand higher rent, removal of tenant-favorable options, or elimination of use restrictions as a condition of executing the new lease they're "requiring." Always negotiate automatic, unconditional attornment — no new owner election, no re-negotiation conditions, just the existing lease continuing with a new landlord.

✅ 12-Item SNDA Negotiation Checklist

Obtain SNDA as a condition precedent to lease effectiveness: The lease should not become binding on the tenant until the landlord's lender has executed a fully negotiated SNDA — this provides maximum tenant leverage in SNDA negotiations
Require non-disturbance to specifically survive foreclosure, deed in lieu, and sale: The lender's non-disturbance commitment must cover all paths to a change of ownership — not just formal foreclosure — including deed in lieu of foreclosure and lender-directed sale
Preserve all tenant options and special rights in the SNDA: Explicitly list and require preservation of: renewal options, expansion options, ROFR, co-tenancy rights, use restrictions, exclusivity clauses, and all other special rights from the lease
Require new owner to fund any unpaid TI allowance: If the original landlord has not yet funded all committed TI allowance at the time of foreclosure, the new owner must be obligated to fund the remaining balance
Narrow the "default" standard for non-disturbance condition: Non-disturbance protection should be conditioned only on the tenant not being in an uncured material default after notice and expiration of all applicable cure periods — not any technical default of any kind
Require security deposit protection: The SNDA must address the tenant's security deposit — either requiring the new owner to credit the tenant's deposit (accepting responsibility) or requiring the original landlord to return the deposit before the foreclosure transfer is complete
Negotiate automatic (not elective) attornment: Require automatic, unconditional attornment to any new owner — without giving the new owner the right to require re-negotiation of lease terms as a condition of accepting the attorney
Protect free rent and rent concessions: Require the SNDA to bind the new owner to all economic lease terms, including free rent periods, rent abatement provisions, and other concessions that were part of the original lease package
Require landlord to obtain SNDA from future lenders: Include a lease covenant requiring the landlord to obtain non-disturbance from any future lender within 30–60 days of placing new mortgage debt — with the tenant's subordination obligation suspended until SNDA is delivered
Establish a response deadline for SNDA requests: The lender must execute and return the SNDA within a defined period (typically 30–45 days) from the tenant's request — with an escalation path (lease termination right) if the deadline is missed
Require recorded SNDA, not just signed SNDA: The SNDA should be recorded in the land records where the property is located — a recorded non-disturbance agreement provides notice to all future parties and survives the original lender's refinancing or sale of the loan
Review SNDA against the entire lease before execution: Compare every provision of the lender SNDA against every material right in your lease — options, allowances, concessions, use rights — to confirm the SNDA either expressly preserves or does not expressly exclude each material right

Frequently Asked Questions

What does SNDA stand for in a commercial lease?

SNDA stands for Subordination, Non-Disturbance, and Attornment — three distinct but related agreements combined in a single document. Subordination: the tenant agrees their lease is junior to the landlord's mortgage. Non-Disturbance: the lender promises not to terminate the tenant's lease if the landlord defaults and the lender forecloses, as long as the tenant is not in default. Attornment: the tenant agrees to recognize any new owner (including a foreclosing lender or foreclosure sale buyer) as the new landlord under the existing lease. SNDA balances the interests of all three parties: lender, tenant, and (future) new owner.

Why is subordination alone dangerous for tenants?

Subordination without non-disturbance means the tenant's lease can be extinguished in a foreclosure. When a tenant subordinates their lease to a mortgage, the lease becomes junior to that mortgage. If the landlord defaults, the lender's foreclosure wipes out all junior interests — including the tenant's lease. The tenant is evicted even if they're paying rent perfectly, simply because the landlord failed financially. The total financial exposure — increased rent at new location, moving costs, TI at new space, business interruption, lost options — easily reaches $840,000+ on a 7-year remaining lease at $40/sf on 3,000sf.

What is non-disturbance in an SNDA agreement?

Non-disturbance is the lender's promise to the tenant that even though the lease is subordinated to the mortgage, the lender will not terminate the tenant's lease if foreclosure occurs — as long as the tenant is not in default. The tenant keeps possession, continues under the existing lease terms, and simply recognizes the new owner as the new landlord. Non-disturbance decouples the tenant's occupancy rights from the landlord's financial health. Without non-disturbance, the tenant's right to remain depends entirely on whether the landlord can keep making mortgage payments.

What does 'quiet enjoyment' mean in commercial leases?

Quiet enjoyment is the landlord's covenant that the tenant will be able to peacefully occupy and use the leased premises for the full term without interference from the landlord, anyone claiming through the landlord, or anyone with a superior property interest — as long as the tenant is in compliance with the lease. In a foreclosure scenario, quiet enjoyment is violated when a superior lien holder extinguishes the tenant's lease. SNDA non-disturbance from the lender is the practical mechanism by which lenders give tenants quiet enjoyment protection vis-à-vis the mortgage — a promise that runs from the lender (who has assets) directly to the tenant.

What is attornment in an SNDA?

Attornment is the tenant's agreement to recognize a new owner after foreclosure as the new landlord under the existing lease. It completes the SNDA structure: the tenant subordinated (to facilitate foreclosure), the lender gave non-disturbance (to protect the tenant through foreclosure), and now the tenant agrees to attorn to whoever takes ownership. Automatic attornment is best for tenants — the tenant automatically recognizes any new owner without any additional agreement. Avoid elective/optional attornment provisions, which give the new owner leverage to re-negotiate lease terms as a condition of accepting the tenant's continued occupancy.

How should tenants negotiate SNDA agreements with lenders?

Key negotiating points: (1) make SNDA a condition precedent to lease effectiveness; (2) require all options and special rights to be preserved; (3) require new owner to fund any unpaid TI allowance; (4) narrow the "default" condition for non-disturbance to uncured material defaults only; (5) protect security deposit return obligation; (6) negotiate automatic (not elective) attornment; (7) require free rent and concessions to survive foreclosure; (8) require landlord to obtain SNDA from future lenders within 30–60 days of new financing; and (9) require the SNDA to be recorded in the land records. Review every material lease right against the SNDA to confirm it is preserved.

Analyze Your SNDA Provisions With LeaseAI

LeaseAI extracts and analyzes SNDA provisions in commercial leases — identifying subordination without non-disturbance, lender form pitfalls, missing option preservation language, and unpaid TI exposure — so you understand your real protection before signing.

Try LeaseAI Free →

Commercial Lease SNDA: Subordination, Non-Disturbance & Attornment — Complete Tenant Guide 2026