What is the change order process in a construction management agreement and how do tenants protect themselves?

A change order is a formal modification to the approved construction scope, cost, or timeline arising after the original construction contract is executed. Change orders in a CMA context occur when: the tenant requests changes to the approved design after construction has begun; unforeseen site conditions (buried MEP conflicts, structural issues, hazardous materials) require scope modifications; code compliance requirements are discovered during permitting; or design errors require correction in the field. In a landlord-managed CMA, the change order process is particularly important for the tenant because: (1) the landlord controls the contractors and has an information advantage on pricing; (2) change orders typically increase total construction cost, which may exhaust the TI allowance faster than planned and require tenant out-of-pocket payments; and (3) unapproved change orders may delay the completion date and affect rent commencement. Tenant protections in the change order process: (a) written change order requirement — no change order is valid without written approval by both parties; verbal authorization is insufficient and creates disputes; (b) cost estimate before authorization — the tenant must receive and approve a cost estimate (including CM fee on the change order scope) before authorizing any change order; (c) landlord-initiated change orders — if the landlord initiates a change order for its own reasons (code compliance, structural issue, building system modification), the landlord bears the cost and time extension, not the tenant; (d) change order log — the CMA should require the landlord to maintain and provide a real-time change order log showing all approved, pending, and rejected change orders, their cost impact, and their schedule impact; (e) design contingency — a pre-funded design contingency (10–15% of construction cost) absorbs minor change orders without requiring tenant approval for each item below a defined threshold (e.g., $5,000 per item, $25,000 aggregate).

Commercial Lease Construction Management Agreement: CMA vs. Work Letter, CM Fees, Change Orders & Punch List 2026

Q: What is a Construction Management Agreement (CMA) in a commercial lease and when does it replace the work letter?

A Construction Management Agreement (CMA) is a formal construction contract supplement to a commercial lease — or a standalone agreement incorporated by reference — that governs the design, procurement, construction, and delivery of tenant improvements (TI) when the landlord serves as the construction manager. Unlike a traditional TI work letter (which is a lease exhibit specifying what the landlord will build, the TI allowance amount, and the basic completion process), a CMA is a full construction management contract with detailed obligations covering: design approval and control, contractor selection and supervision, change order process, progress reporting, draw request procedures, lien waiver requirements, punch list protocols, and final completion standards. A CMA typically replaces the traditional work letter when: (1) the buildout is large and complex (typically $300K+ in TI value); (2) the landlord takes on substantive construction management responsibility beyond simply funding a TI allowance; (3) the deal involves a turnkey delivery where the landlord designs and builds to the tenant's specifications; or (4) the project involves specialty construction (data center infrastructure, life sciences lab buildout, healthcare build-to-suit) where detailed contractual construction oversight is essential. In simpler deals — a standard office TI with a relatively modest allowance — a detailed work letter as a lease exhibit is typically sufficient without a separate CMA. The threshold for when a separate CMA is warranted is roughly a $250,000–$500,000+ TI construction scope, though market practice varies by landlord and deal type.

Q: How is the landlord's construction management fee calculated and is it negotiable?

The landlord's construction management (CM) fee — also called a supervision fee, project management fee, or construction administration fee — is the amount the landlord charges for overseeing the TI construction process. This fee is charged in addition to the actual construction costs; it compensates the landlord for staff time, administrative costs, contractor coordination, and building access management associated with the TI project. Market-standard CM fees range from 5% to 10% of total hard construction costs (sometimes including soft costs; sometimes excluding them — the scope of the fee base is negotiable). The fee structure matters enormously because: on a $500,000 construction project, a 5% fee = $25,000 and a 10% fee = $50,000 — a $25,000 difference for the same oversight work. Large institutional landlords typically charge 5–7% for standard office buildouts. Smaller private landlords may charge 8–10% because their administrative overhead is less efficient. The fee is almost always negotiable, particularly for larger TI projects where the absolute dollar amount is material. Tenants with the strongest negotiating leverage — creditworthy tenants, large space requirements, long lease terms — should target a fee at the low end of market (5%) or negotiate a fee cap (e.g., 7% of hard costs up to a maximum of $30,000) to limit exposure on cost overruns. Some tenants successfully negotiate for the right to use their own CM — bypassing the landlord's fee entirely — in exchange for a fee credit or agreement that the landlord will not charge its CM fee when the tenant self-manages construction.

Q: What are lien waiver requirements in a CMA and why are they important for tenants?

A mechanic's lien (also called a construction lien or materialman's lien in some states) is a legal claim that contractors, subcontractors, and material suppliers can file against real property when they are not paid for construction work. In a commercial TI buildout, multiple parties perform work and supply materials — the general contractor, 5–15 subcontractors (electrical, HVAC, plumbing, drywall, millwork, technology), and material suppliers. If any of these parties are not paid, they may file a lien against the landlord's property, potentially clouding the tenant's occupancy rights and the landlord's title. Lien waivers are documents signed by contractors and subcontractors confirming that they have been paid and waiving any lien rights for the work covered by the payment. There are two primary types: (1) conditional lien waivers — effective only upon receipt of payment; (2) unconditional lien waivers — effective regardless of whether payment is actually received (used only after payment is confirmed). In a CMA context, the tenant should require: (a) conditional lien waivers from the general contractor and all major subcontractors as a prerequisite to each draw request — the landlord cannot draw down TI funds unless it has obtained lien waivers for all work covered by the prior draw; (b) unconditional lien waivers from all contractors and subcontractors upon final payment, as a prerequisite to substantial completion acceptance; (c) a lien release bond from the general contractor (or the landlord's parent company) indemnifying the tenant against any lien claims arising from the construction. Without these protections, a subcontractor who was not paid by the general contractor can file a lien against the property that affects the tenant's occupancy, even though the tenant had nothing to do with the payment failure.

Q: How does the draw schedule work in a CMA and how does it connect to TI allowance disbursement?

The draw schedule in a CMA governs how and when the landlord disburses TI allowance funds during the construction process. TI allowance funds are typically held by the landlord (sometimes escrowed with a third party) and disbursed in draws as construction progresses, rather than paid as a lump sum at the start. A typical draw schedule structure: (1) Mobilization draw (10–15% of TI): paid when construction begins, the building permit is issued, and the contractor's bonds and insurance certificates are on file; (2) Progress draws (50–60% of TI): paid in 3–5 draws as construction reaches defined completion milestones (e.g., rough-in complete, framing complete, drywall complete, MEP rough-in complete) — each draw requires AIA G702/G703 application and certificate for payment forms, conditional lien waivers for the completed work, and the architect's certification of percentage completion; (3) Substantial completion draw (20–25% of TI): paid when the space reaches substantial completion (the space is usable for its intended purpose, even if minor punch list items remain); (4) Retainage (5–10% of TI): held back until all punch list items are completed and unconditional lien waivers received from all parties. Tenants negotiating the draw schedule should focus on: (a) defining draw triggers clearly (avoid vague milestone language like 'approximately 50% complete' in favor of defined scope milestones); (b) setting draw processing timelines (the landlord must process draws within 10–15 business days of a complete draw request); (c) ensuring retainage is held to incentivize punch list completion; and (d) confirming that interest earned on escrowed TI funds accrues to the tenant, not the landlord.

Q: What is the punch list process and how should final completion be defined in a CMA?

The punch list is the formal list of construction items that are incomplete, incorrect, or deficient at the time of substantial completion — items that must be corrected before final completion is achieved and the tenant's acceptance of the space is final. The punch list process in a CMA typically works as follows: when the landlord declares substantial completion (the space is substantially complete and usable), a joint inspection is conducted by the tenant, the tenant's architect or project manager, and the landlord's construction manager; items identified as incomplete or deficient are documented in the punch list; the general contractor has a defined period (typically 30–60 days) to complete all punch list items; upon punch list completion, a final inspection confirms resolution; upon satisfactory final inspection, the tenant provides written acceptance and the landlord disburses retainage. Tenant protections in the punch list process: (a) the right to conduct the joint inspection with the tenant's own architect or project manager present; (b) a defined punch list completion deadline (30 days for standard items, 60 days for items requiring long-lead materials) with rent abatement if the deadline is missed; (c) a 'deemed complete' threshold — items that are cosmetic in nature and do not affect the usability of the space may be deemed complete for purposes of triggering rent commencement even if they remain on the punch list; (d) a warranty period — the landlord warranties all TI construction for a minimum of one year from substantial completion, with an obligation to repair any defects discovered during the warranty period at the landlord's cost.

The Real Math: CM Fee Structures on a $500K Buildout

Construction Management Fee Analysis — $500,000 TI Buildout

BASE SCENARIO: 5,000 SF Office Buildout
Hard construction costs: $500,000 ($100/sf)
Soft costs (design, permits, testing): $60,000 (12%)
Total project budget: $560,000

OPTION A: LANDLORD CM AT 8% OF HARD COSTS
CM fee base: $500,000 hard costs
CM fee (8%): $40,000
Total project cost (hard + CM): $540,000
Tenant soft costs (separate): $60,000
Total all-in: $600,000

OPTION B: TENANT'S OWN CM AT 5% OF HARD COSTS
CM fee base: $500,000 hard costs
CM fee (5%): $25,000
No landlord CM fee
Total project cost (hard + CM): $525,000
Tenant soft costs (separate): $60,000
Total all-in: $585,000

DIRECT CM FEE COMPARISON:
Landlord CM (8%): $40,000
Tenant's own CM (5%): $25,000
Savings using tenant's own CM: $15,000

DESIGN CONTINGENCY ANALYSIS:
Design contingency (12% of hard costs): $60,000
Design contingency (15% of hard costs): $75,000
Minimum recommended contingency: $60,000
Purpose: Absorbs design changes, unforeseen conditions,
minor change orders without formal approval process

CHANGE ORDER COST IMPACT:
Average commercial TI change order rate: 5–15% of
original construction cost
Low scenario (5%): $25,000 in change orders
High scenario (15%): $75,000 in change orders
With 12% contingency ($60K): absorbs low scenario fully;
$15,000 shortfall in high scenario

AFTER-HOURS CONSTRUCTION PREMIUM:
After-hours construction work (tenant operations not disrupted)
Premium over standard hours: 20–35%
$500K buildout with 30% after-hours work:
$150K × 25% premium = $37,500 additional cost

RETAINAGE IMPACT ON CASH FLOW:
Retainage (10% of TI allowance held until final completion):
$500K TI × 10% = $50,000 held by landlord
Duration: Until punch list complete (avg. 30–90 days
after substantial completion)
Cost of withheld capital at 6%: $50,000 × 6% × 75 days / 365
= $616 opportunity cost
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
THE CHOICE: $15K SAVED WITH TENANT'S OWN CM.
KNOW YOUR OPTIONS BEFORE SIGNING THE CMA.

TI Structure Comparison: Which Approach Is Right for Your Deal?

Feature / Term	Traditional Work Letter	CMA (Landlord as CM)	Tenant's Own CM	Turnkey Delivery
Who manages construction	Landlord manages with basic work letter obligations; limited tenant oversight	Landlord serves as formal construction manager with contractual CM obligations under the CMA	Tenant hires its own CM who manages the GC; landlord approves plans and monitors but doesn't manage	Landlord builds the space to tenant specifications and delivers it complete; tenant has no construction management role
CM fee structure	Typically included in overall cost; no separate CM fee line item; landlord's overhead baked into GC selection and markup	Explicit CM fee of 5–10% of hard construction costs; tenant pays CM fee in addition to hard costs out of TI allowance	Tenant pays its own CM (typically 3–5% of project cost); no landlord CM fee; tenant's CM fee comes out of TI allowance or tenant pocket	No CM fee to tenant; landlord includes all overhead in the turnkey delivery; tenant evaluates total cost of turnkey delivery vs. allowance alternative
Contractor selection	Landlord selects GC from approved list; tenant may review bids but has limited selection authority	Landlord selects GC; tenant may have approval right for GC and major subcontractors under CMA; bid process may be required	Tenant selects GC from landlord's approved contractor list; competitive bid process; tenant's CM manages bid solicitation	Landlord selects all contractors; tenant has no contractor selection role; quality standards defined in the CMA/work letter
Cost overrun risk	Tenant bears overrun risk above TI allowance amount; limited visibility into cost during construction	Tenant bears overrun risk but CMA requires cost reporting and change order approval — tenant has real-time visibility and approval rights	Tenant has full visibility and approval authority over cost; GC contract is with tenant; tenant's CM manages cost in real time	Landlord bears cost overrun risk for scope agreed in the CMA; tenant bears overruns only for tenant-requested changes
Change order process	Informal; tenant requests changes; landlord approves and bills; limited documentation; disputes common	Formal CMA change order process: written authorization, cost estimate, CM fee on change order scope, schedule impact assessment; documented and trackable	Tenant's CM manages change order process; competitive pricing; tenant controls authorization; change order log maintained	Changes to turnkey scope treated as change orders to landlord's fixed-price obligation; landlord bears pricing risk for agreed scope changes
Lien waiver process	Often minimal; landlord may not systematically collect lien waivers; tenant has limited visibility	CMA requires systematic lien waiver collection as condition to each draw; tenant review of lien waiver package before TI disbursement	Tenant's CM manages lien waiver collection; conditional waivers with each draw; unconditional waivers at final completion	Landlord responsible for obtaining all lien waivers and delivering final lien release to tenant at substantial completion
Punch list and completion	Often informal; completion standard may be undefined; disputes about what constitutes a punch list item are common	CMA defines punch list process, completion timeline, and remedies; retainage held until punch list complete; formal joint inspection required	Tenant controls punch list and acceptance; tenant's CM conducts inspection; tenant signs off on final completion	Landlord warrants delivery to agreed specifications; punch list is landlord's obligation to resolve; tenant has clear contractual remedies
Best for	Smaller TI scopes (under $200K); simpler build-outs; tenants comfortable deferring to landlord construction management	Midsize to large TI scopes ($300K–$2M+); tenants who want construction oversight without managing it themselves; deals where landlord has a strong construction team	Tenants with in-house construction expertise or a preferred CM relationship; deals where landlord's contractor pricing is above market; large TI scopes	Tenants who prioritize simplicity and delivery certainty over cost control; landlords who specialize in turn-key delivery

When a CMA Replaces the Traditional Work Letter

The Work Letter as the Default

In most commercial lease transactions, tenant improvement construction is governed by a TI work letter — a lease exhibit (typically Exhibit C or Exhibit D) that specifies the TI allowance amount, who performs construction (landlord or tenant), the basic approval process for plans, the completion standard, and the remedies if construction isn't completed on time. For straightforward deals with moderate TI scopes ($50,000–$250,000), a detailed work letter as a lease exhibit is entirely sufficient. The work letter can be 5–15 pages and cover all the essential construction terms without the formality and complexity of a separate Construction Management Agreement. The work letter is the appropriate vehicle when the landlord is primarily serving as a funding source (disbursing TI allowance to the tenant or tenant's contractors) rather than as an active construction manager.

A CMA becomes the appropriate structure when the landlord is taking on substantive construction management responsibility — selecting contractors, managing the construction process, making day-to-day construction decisions — for a significant TI project. The CMA formalizes the landlord's construction management role with explicit contractual obligations that don't fit neatly into a lease exhibit: the obligation to maintain a construction schedule, the obligation to report costs and progress, the obligation to obtain lien waivers and insurance certificates, and the obligation to warrant the construction for defects. When the landlord is functioning as the de facto general contractor (selecting and managing all subcontractors, rather than hiring a GC who manages subs), a CMA is essential documentation of the landlord's obligations.

CMA Trigger Thresholds by Market

Market practice on CMA usage varies by market, landlord type, and deal complexity. As a general guide: in primary markets (New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, Washington D.C.), institutional REIT landlords typically use CMAs for TI scopes above $300–$500 per square foot or total project costs above $500,000. In secondary and tertiary markets, the threshold is lower — CMAs may be used for projects as small as $150,000–$200,000 in total scope. Private landlords, family office landlords, and smaller regional landlords often use enhanced work letters rather than formal CMAs even for larger TI projects, because their construction management process is less formalized and the CMA structure adds administrative complexity they're not equipped to manage. The tenant's signal that a CMA is appropriate: when the landlord's proposal refers to the landlord as "construction manager," when the landlord proposes a CM fee as a line item in the TI budget, or when the landlord presents a detailed construction management proposal that goes beyond the standard work letter structure.

The CM Fee: 5–10% — What You're Actually Paying For

What the Landlord's CM Fee Covers

The landlord's construction management fee — typically 5–10% of hard construction costs — is compensation for the landlord's staff time and administrative overhead in managing the TI construction process. What the CM fee is supposed to cover: the landlord's project manager's time coordinating with the GC and tenant; building access management (coordinating construction crew access with building security and operations); review and approval of construction documents; coordination with the landlord's building engineers for MEP system integration; insurance and bond review; draw request processing; and inspection and punch list management. What the CM fee often does not cover but may be charged for (a source of tenant disputes): the landlord's attorney fees for reviewing the CMA and work letter; plan review fees (which should be building permit fees only); costs of any changes to common area systems required by the tenant's build-out (these should be addressed separately). Negotiate a clear scope of what is and is not included in the CM fee at the LOI stage.

Negotiating the CM Fee: What Tenants Can Achieve

The landlord's CM fee is more negotiable than most tenants realize, particularly for larger TI projects where the absolute dollar amount is material. Effective negotiation approaches: Fee cap — negotiate a percentage fee with an absolute dollar cap: "7% of hard construction costs, not to exceed $35,000." This caps the tenant's exposure if the project runs over the original budget. Competitive bid right — negotiate the tenant's right to solicit competitive bids from third-party CMs and the landlord's obligation to match the lowest qualified bid or allow the tenant to use its own CM instead. Reduced fee for tenant's own GC — if the tenant selects the GC from the landlord's approved list, negotiate a reduced CM fee (3–4% rather than 7–8%) on the basis that the tenant is assuming more project management responsibility. Fee-free threshold — negotiate that the first $100,000 of hard construction costs is CM-fee-free (on the basis that a small portion of TI for basic improvements doesn't require meaningful construction management), with the CM fee applying only to amounts above the threshold. On a $500,000 project, a fee-free $100,000 threshold reduces the CM fee base to $400,000 — saving $4,000–$8,000 at a 4–8% fee rate.

The Change Order Process in a CMA

Types of Change Orders and Who Initiates Them

Understanding the types of change orders and their appropriate allocation is essential for protecting the tenant's budget and completion timeline. Tenant-initiated change orders arise when the tenant requests modifications to the approved design after construction has begun — a different finish material, an added conference room, a relocated partition wall. These are the tenant's responsibility: the tenant pays for the additional cost and agrees to any schedule extension required by the change. Tenant-initiated changes are authorized through a written change order signed by both parties; the CM fee applies to the change order's hard cost scope. Unforeseen conditions change orders arise from conditions discovered during construction that were not visible during pre-construction site inspection — buried utilities not shown on as-built drawings, structural elements that conflict with planned MEP routing, asbestos-containing materials in existing construction, unexpected soil conditions in ground-level work. These require careful allocation: if the condition was discoverable through reasonable pre-construction due diligence, the landlord may argue the tenant should bear the cost. If the condition is truly unforeseen and related to the building's existing construction (not the tenant's planned work), the landlord should bear the cost. Negotiate clear language allocating unforeseen condition risk to the landlord for conditions related to the building's existing systems and structure. Landlord-initiated change orders arise when the landlord's construction management decisions (contractor substitution, construction sequencing changes, code compliance modifications) require changes to the agreed scope. These are entirely the landlord's responsibility — cost and schedule impact.

Lien Waiver Requirements

The Lien Waiver Process in Practice

A robust lien waiver collection process in a CMA protects both the tenant's occupancy rights and the landlord's title throughout the construction period. The practical mechanics: before each draw, the general contractor submits a draw request package to the landlord's CM that includes: (1) AIA G702 Application and Certificate for Payment from the architect, certifying the percentage of work completed; (2) Schedule of Values (AIA G703) showing the breakdown of costs by trade; (3) conditional lien waivers from the GC covering the amount of the current draw; (4) conditional lien waivers from all subcontractors and material suppliers whose work is covered by the current draw; (5) copies of all invoices from material suppliers for materials incorporated in the work. The landlord's CM reviews the package, verifies the claimed completion percentage against field observations, and approves the draw. Upon payment, the GC provides unconditional lien waivers for the paid amount. This process, done correctly, ensures that the landlord's title and the tenant's occupancy rights are fully protected at each stage of construction.

The practical challenge: lien waiver collection from multiple subcontractors — particularly lower-tier subs and material suppliers who may have multiple jobs active — can be administratively burdensome and slow. A GC who is slow to collect and return sub lien waivers can delay draw processing by 1–2 weeks per draw. Negotiate: (1) a defined timeline for GC to deliver complete lien waiver packages (10 business days from payment); (2) the GC's construction contract (which the landlord executes with the GC) requires the GC to maintain lien waiver collection as a condition of its payment; (3) at final completion, the GC delivers a complete lien release package covering all parties who performed work on the project — this package should be a condition of retainage payment.

Design Contingency: 10–15% Is Not Optional

Why Design Contingencies Get Spent

A design contingency is a budget reserve — typically 10–15% of hard construction costs — held in reserve to absorb unforeseen costs, minor design changes, pricing variances, and change orders that don't rise to the level of requiring formal change order approval. On a $500,000 construction project, a 12% contingency = $60,000 in reserve. This reserve is not optional; it is a necessary feature of any realistic construction budget. The reasons design contingencies get spent: Design coordination gaps — conflicts between architectural plans, structural drawings, and MEP designs that are discovered during construction and require field-level resolution. Every field resolution has a cost. Pricing variance — the difference between the architect's estimated cost and the actual bid price from subcontractors. In a supply-constrained or high-demand construction market, bid prices can exceed estimates by 10–20% for specialty trades. Owner-directed minor changes — the hundreds of small decisions made during construction (finishes, fixture selections, outlet locations, millwork details) that cumulatively cost 3–8% of the construction budget. Unforeseen site conditions — as discussed above, conditions discovered during construction that require scope modifications. Permit and inspection costs — fees, revision costs, and re-inspection costs associated with permitting that weren't fully captured in the original soft cost budget.

6 Red Flags in Construction Management Agreements

🛑 Red Flag 1: CM Fee Applies to Both Hard and Soft Costs

A CMA that applies the landlord's CM fee to total project costs (hard costs plus soft costs including design fees, permit fees, and testing) rather than hard costs only significantly increases the tenant's CM fee exposure. On a $500,000 hard cost project with $75,000 in soft costs, an 8% fee applied to $575,000 total = $46,000 vs. $40,000 on hard costs alone — an $6,000 difference. More importantly, the landlord is charging a CM fee on work that isn't construction management (design fees are paid to the architect, not managed by the landlord's CM). Always confirm the CM fee base: it should apply to hard construction costs only, specifically excluding design fees, permit fees, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and soft costs that are not part of the physical construction scope.

🛑 Red Flag 2: No Written Change Order Requirement

A CMA that permits change orders to be authorized verbally, by email, or by any means other than a formal written change order signed by both parties is a budget control failure waiting to happen. Verbal authorizations are disputed; email trails are incomplete; informal approvals don't capture cost estimates, schedule impacts, or CM fee implications. Construction disputes arising from unauthorized or disputed change orders are among the most common and costly construction litigation matters in commercial real estate. The standard: no change order is valid without a written change order document signed by the authorized representatives of both the landlord/CM and the tenant, including the change order cost, the schedule impact, and the updated contract sum after the change order.

🛑 Red Flag 3: No Defined Punch List Completion Deadline

A CMA that requires the landlord to complete the punch list "within a reasonable time" or "promptly after substantial completion" without a defined deadline and remedies gives the landlord no urgency to complete minor items. Once the tenant moves in and begins paying full rent, the landlord's incentive to send contractors back for punch list items diminishes considerably — the revenue is already flowing. Define the punch list completion deadline: 30 days for standard items, 60 days for items requiring special-order materials or extended lead times. Define the remedy for missed deadlines: the tenant may hire its own contractor to complete the punch list items and deduct the cost from rent, or the landlord must provide a rent credit equal to the daily cost of the incomplete items until resolved. Without defined deadlines and remedies, punch lists linger for months.

🛑 Red Flag 4: Landlord Retains Sole Contractor Selection Authority Without Competitive Bidding Requirement

A CMA that gives the landlord sole authority to select the general contractor and subcontractors without any competitive bidding requirement or tenant approval right creates conditions for above-market pricing at the tenant's expense. Landlords often have preferred contractor relationships that benefit from relationship-based pricing — not always the most competitive pricing. If the TI allowance funds the construction and cost overruns come out of the tenant's pocket, the tenant has a direct financial interest in competitive contractor pricing. Negotiate: the right to require competitive bids from at least three qualified GCs for any TI project above a defined cost threshold ($100,000); the right to review and approve the GC selection; and at minimum, the right to see the bid comparison even if the final selection authority remains with the landlord.

🛑 Red Flag 5: Insufficient Design Contingency With No Process for Contingency Top-Up

A CMA with a 5% design contingency — $25,000 on a $500,000 project — in a current construction market where material costs, labor shortages, and supply chain disruption routinely drive 10–15% budget variances is a setup for mid-project cost crisis. When the contingency is exhausted, the tenant either authorizes additional funding (from its own funds, outside the TI allowance) or construction stalls. Negotiate: a minimum 12% contingency on any TI project above $200,000; a process for contingency top-up if the contingency drops below 5% of remaining construction costs (the tenant has the right to replenish the contingency, pause construction, or reduce scope); and monthly contingency usage reporting so the tenant can track burn rate in real time.

🛑 Red Flag 6: No Warranty Period for TI Construction

A CMA that is silent on construction warranties — or that specifies only a 90-day warranty after substantial completion — leaves the tenant with minimal protection against latent construction defects that appear 6–18 months after move-in. Common latent defects in commercial TI construction: HVAC equipment that functions adequately for the first 6 months then fails prematurely due to installation defects; plumbing connections that develop slow leaks behind finished walls; electrical work that passes inspection but fails under load; millwork that warps due to improper moisture sealing. Industry standard for commercial construction warranties is one year for all TI work. Structural and MEP systems should carry 2-year warranties from the installing subcontractors. Negotiate a minimum one-year warranty from substantial completion with the landlord's obligation to remediate all defects reported during the warranty period at the landlord's cost.

✅ 12-Item CMA Negotiation Checklist

Define the CM fee base as hard construction costs only — excluding soft costs: Confirm that the landlord's CM fee applies only to hard construction costs (physical construction and materials) and not to design fees, permit fees, furniture, testing, or other soft costs. On a $500,000 hard cost project, the difference between a fee on hard costs only vs. total project costs at 8% can be $4,000–$8,000. Always specify the fee base explicitly in the CMA, not just the percentage.
Negotiate the CM fee to the low end of market range (5–7%) with an absolute dollar cap: Market range is 5–10%; negotiate to 5–7% for standard office buildouts. Add an absolute dollar cap (e.g., "8% of hard costs, not to exceed $35,000") to limit exposure on cost overruns or scope expansions. If the landlord won't move on percentage, the cap is the critical protection — it prevents the fee from escalating if the project runs over budget.
Negotiate the right to use tenant's own CM as an alternative to the landlord's CM: Include a provision allowing the tenant to elect its own CM (from a list of three pre-qualified firms) in lieu of the landlord acting as CM. If the tenant elects its own CM, the landlord's CM fee is waived or reduced to a building coordination fee (1–2% for building access management, plan review, and MEP coordination). This right gives the tenant leverage even if it ultimately chooses to use the landlord's CM.
Require competitive bidding for GC and major subcontractors: For any TI project above $150,000, require the landlord to solicit competitive bids from at least three qualified GCs and provide the bid tabulation to the tenant. The tenant has approval rights over the final GC selection (approval not to be unreasonably withheld). For projects above $300,000, require competitive bidding for the three to five largest subcontractor scopes (electrical, mechanical, plumbing, drywall) as well.
Require written change orders with cost estimates before authorization: No change order is valid without: a written change order document; a cost breakdown from the GC; the CM fee applicable to the change order scope; the schedule impact; and written authorization by the tenant's designated representative. Verbal or email authorizations are invalid. Include a threshold: for change orders below $2,500, the CM may approve with written notice; above $2,500, tenant authorization is required.
Negotiate a 12–15% design contingency with monthly usage reporting: Specify a minimum contingency of 12% of hard construction costs, held as a line item in the project budget. Require monthly contingency usage reports showing how much contingency has been consumed and for what purpose. If contingency drops below 5% of remaining budget, the tenant has the right to pause construction, reduce scope, or replenish the contingency — the project does not continue to the next phase without tenant authorization.
Require conditional lien waivers from GC and all major subs as a draw condition: No draw is disbursed without a complete set of conditional lien waivers from the GC and all subcontractors and material suppliers covering the work claimed in the draw request. The landlord's CM must review and verify lien waivers before approving each draw. At final completion, unconditional lien waivers and a complete lien release from the GC are required before retainage is released.
Define substantial completion with a clear standard: "Substantial completion" is the trigger for rent commencement in most leases — define it precisely. Recommended standard: the space has received a certificate of occupancy (or temporary certificate of occupancy) from the applicable building authority, all base building systems serving the demised premises are operational, and the space is accessible and usable for its intended purpose. Minor punch list items (cosmetic deficiencies that do not materially affect usability) do not prevent substantial completion but must be completed within 30 days.
Define the punch list completion deadline with a rent credit remedy: Punch list items must be completed within 30 days of the punch list date (60 days for items requiring long-lead materials, with tenant consent to the extended period). If the landlord misses the punch list deadline, the tenant may hire its own contractor to complete the items and deduct the cost from rent, or the landlord must provide a daily rent credit equal to the proportional value of the incomplete items until resolved.
Negotiate a one-year construction warranty from substantial completion: All TI construction is warranted by the landlord for a period of one year from substantial completion. During the warranty period, the landlord must repair any defect in materials or workmanship at no cost to the tenant within 15 business days of written notice (or immediately for emergency conditions). MEP systems carry a two-year warranty. Structural elements carry a three-year warranty. The warranty survives lease execution and is an independent obligation of the landlord.
Negotiate draw processing timelines — 10 business days from complete submission: The landlord must process each complete draw request within 10 business days of receipt and notify the tenant of any deficiencies in the draw package within 5 business days (giving the tenant the opportunity to cure deficiencies). Slow draw processing creates cash flow problems for the GC, which can affect construction momentum and subcontractor performance. A defined draw processing timeline with a deemed-approved remedy (draws automatically approved if not processed within 15 business days) creates landlord accountability.
Require as-built drawings within 60 days of final completion: The landlord must deliver complete as-built drawings (reflecting all construction as actually built, including any change orders) within 60 days of final completion. As-built drawings are essential for: future renovation planning; MEP service and maintenance; subtenant or future tenant improvements; and building permit applications. Without as-built drawings, the tenant is unable to plan future modifications efficiently and must pay for new surveys and as-built documentation for any subsequent construction.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Construction Management Agreement (CMA) in a commercial lease and when does it replace the work letter?

A CMA is a formal construction management contract governing the design, procurement, construction, and delivery of TI improvements when the landlord serves as construction manager. It replaces the standard work letter when: (1) the TI scope is large and complex (typically $300K+); (2) the landlord takes substantive construction management responsibility, not just TI funding; (3) the project involves specialty construction; or (4) the deal is a turnkey delivery where the landlord designs and builds to tenant specifications. For smaller TI projects, a detailed work letter as a lease exhibit is typically sufficient without a separate CMA. The signal that a CMA is appropriate: the landlord proposes a CM fee as a line item or references its CM role in the LOI.

How is the landlord's construction management fee calculated and is it negotiable?

The CM fee is typically 5–10% of hard construction costs (not total project costs including soft costs). On a $500,000 hard cost project: 5% = $25,000; 8% = $40,000; 10% = $50,000. The fee is meaningfully negotiable, particularly for larger projects. Effective negotiating strategies: negotiate a percentage at the low end of market (5–7%) with an absolute dollar cap; negotiate the right to use the tenant's own CM instead (waiving the landlord's fee); require competitive bidding to validate cost; negotiate a fee-free threshold for the first $100,000 of costs. A $15,000 fee savings on a single project is not uncommon with focused negotiation.

What is the change order process in a CMA and how do tenants protect themselves?

Every change order must be in writing — no verbal or email authorizations. The process: the CM prepares a written change order with a cost breakdown from the GC (including CM fee on the additional scope) and a schedule impact assessment; the tenant reviews and either approves, rejects, or requests modification; upon tenant signature, the change order is incorporated into the contract. Tenant protections: (1) written authorization required for any change above a defined threshold (e.g., $2,500); (2) cost estimate before authorization (no retroactive change orders); (3) landlord-initiated changes (code compliance, unforeseen conditions in building systems) are the landlord's cost; (4) a 12% design contingency absorbs minor changes without formal approval for items below a defined per-item threshold.

What are lien waiver requirements in a CMA and why are they important for tenants?

Lien waivers from contractors, subcontractors, and material suppliers protect the tenant's occupancy rights and the landlord's title from mechanic's lien claims. In a CMA, conditional lien waivers from the GC and all major subs are required as a condition of each draw disbursement — the landlord cannot pay the GC without first receiving lien waivers for the prior draw. At final completion, unconditional lien waivers from all parties are required before retainage is released. Without systematic lien waiver collection, a subcontractor who wasn't paid by the GC can file a lien against the property that clouds the tenant's occupancy rights — even though the tenant had nothing to do with the payment failure.

How does the draw schedule work in a CMA and how does it connect to TI allowance disbursement?

TI allowance funds are disbursed in draws tied to construction milestones: mobilization draw (10–15% at construction start); progress draws (50–60% across 3–5 milestone draws); substantial completion draw (20–25%); and retainage (5–10% held until all punch list items complete and final unconditional lien waivers received). Each draw requires AIA G702/G703 payment application forms, architect's certification of completion percentage, and conditional lien waivers. Draw processing timeline should be contractually defined (10 business days from complete submission). Negotiate that interest on escrowed TI funds accrues to the tenant, not the landlord, if funds are held in a separate account.

What is the punch list process and how should final completion be defined in a CMA?

The punch list is the list of construction items incomplete or deficient at substantial completion that must be resolved before final acceptance. The process: at substantial completion, a joint inspection (tenant + tenant's architect or PM, landlord's CM, GC) produces the punch list; the GC has 30 days (60 for long-lead items) to complete all items; a final inspection confirms resolution; upon satisfactory sign-off, the tenant provides written acceptance and the landlord releases retainage. Key protections: (1) tenant has the right to have its own representative conduct the inspection; (2) defined punch list completion deadline with a rent credit remedy for missed deadlines; (3) one-year warranty from substantial completion with landlord obligation to repair all defects; (4) cosmetic-only items don't prevent rent commencement.

Know What Your CMA Actually Obligates You To — Before You Sign

LeaseAI analyzes your Construction Management Agreement and TI work letter to identify CM fee overcharges, missing lien waiver protections, undefined punch list standards, and change order exposure — so you negotiate from knowledge, not assumption.

Try LeaseAI Free →

Commercial Lease Construction Management Agreement: CMA vs. Work Letter, Landlord CM Fees, Change Orders, Lien Waivers & Punch List 2026